ALLIED EMERGENCY SERVICES COURT DOCUMENT ARCHIVE · THE HAIL FILES
Archive › Documents › 20261019-1067143718-defendant-state-farm-fire-and-casualty-c

STATE FARM HAIL-CLAIM LITIGATION

20261019-1067143718-defendant-state-farm-fire-and-casualty-company-s-motion-to-strike.pdf

Oklahoma · Filed 2026-10-19 · 18 pages · Download the PDF

What this document says (first page, verbatim)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY FILED DISTRICT COURT BILLY & LACY HURSH, Lo. Plaintiffs, Vv. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY; MARK D. WELTY; and MARK D. WELTY INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., 4444444444 OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA October 19, 2026 5:03 PM RICK WARREN, COURT Case Number CJ-2025-2626 Case No. CJ-2025-2626 Defendants. DEFENDANT STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY’S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ ORIGINAL AND CORRECTED NOTICES OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY ON STATE FARM’S EXECUTIVES’ KNOWLEDGE OF BAD FAITH TACTICS AND OUTCOME-BASED CLAIM HANDLING Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. …

Key terms in this filing

deposition ×12 · bad faith ×6 · FME ×4 · protective order ×4 · sanction ×4 · denial ×2 · indemnity ×1 · roof replacement ×1

Notable passages

PAGE 5 · FME, denial, bad faith, deposition

… m’s work with Accenture does not establish unique knowledge of Plaintiffs’ insurance claims. Ms. Ress also testified that she was not “directly involved in the FME.” See Ex. 1, relevant excerpts of Deposition of Kathy Ress, Hursh v. State Farm, No. CJ2025-2626 (“Ress Dep.’’) at p. 346:3-4 (“I’m not directly involved in — in FME[.]”); id. at p. 339 (“I was not a member nor a sponsor of [the FME]”). Ms. Ress’s “work wi …

PAGE 4 · denial, protective order, deposition

… (“The Court finds [State Farm’s] Motion for a Protective Order and to Quash Plaintiffs’ Deposition Notice of State Farm’s Chief Executive Officer Jon Farney is Denied as Per Journal Entry”’).) Second, the Notice identifies no authority that was “issued after a party’s final brief on [a] motion has been filed,” which is a standard requirement for notices of supplemental authority. Indeed, Plaintiffs’ Notice does not c …

PAGE 6 · indemnity, bad faith, protective order, roof replacement

… ces and value for State Farm’s customers, which does not comport with Plaintiffs’ characterization of the term as referring to a purported initiative to reduce indemnity payments. (See infra at 7.)

Search every page of this and 59 other filings: full-text search · Context: Trial Watch calendar

← 20261019-1067142063-plaintiffs-corrected-emergency-motion-to-compel-re20261019-1067143621-state-farm-answer-to-state-of-oklahoma-petition.pd →

Get notified when new documents unseal

The next document wave is expected around September 19; trial begins December 7. One email per development — filings and unsealed documents only, no marketing, unsubscribe in one click.

Your address is used only for these alerts and is never shared or added to any sales list.

Excerpts are verbatim OCR text from the public court record and may contain OCR errors; refer to the PDF for the authoritative text, or obtain certified copies from the court clerk for court use. Allegations in filings are claims made by parties in litigation, not findings of fact.

About the host: Allied Emergency Services is a licensed storm-damage restoration contractor serving Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan — not a law firm, insurance adjuster or public adjuster, and this page is not legal or insurance advice. We inspect, document, provide insurance-ready repair estimates and complete repairs; coverage decisions always belong to you and your insurer. 24/7: (800) 792-0212

Archive home · All documents · Search · Trial Watch · alliedemergencyservices.com
Allied Emergency Services, Inc. · Hosted as a public service · Documents are unaltered public court records