WEST V. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.
Comanche County District Court, CJ-2025-135 · Filed 2026-07-17 · 7 pages · Download the PDF
FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMANCHE COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA COMANCHE COUNTY. OKLAHOMA July 16, 2026 3:33 PM ROBERT MORALES, COURT CLERK Case Number CJ-2025-135 NEIL and LACY WEST, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Vv. ) Case No. CJ-2025-135 ) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and NANCY HOLCOMB INS. _ AGENCY, INC,, ) ) ) ) Defendants. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE SHEPERD ) ) DEFENDANT NANCY HOLCOMB INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TIMILA S. ROTHER, OBA #14310 PAIGE A. MASTERS, OBA #31142 AMANDA M. …
summary judgment ×15 · denial ×6 · deposition ×3 · Hail Focus ×1 · bad faith ×1
PAGE 3 · denial, deposition, summary judgment
… lack of diligence and choices. They have not and cannot explain their delay. For that reason alone, their request for more time to respond to the MS] should be denied and the undisputed material facts set forth in the MSJ should be deemed admitted. R. Dist. Cts, of Okla. R. 13(b) (“All material facts set forth in the statement of the movant which are supported by acceptable evidentiary material shall be deemed admitt …
PAGE 2 · denial, deposition, summary judgment
… due diligence in the time that was already allotted.” Fed. Land Bank of Wichita v. Musgrove, 1990 OK CIV APP 64, { 7, 796 P.2d 641, 644. “[I]t is not error to deny a continuance in order to afford time to controvert adverse evidence, when the record reflects there was a fair opportunity to controvert and there was no explanation of the nature of the evidence expected to be adduced if the continuance was granted.” Jd …
PAGE 4 · Hail Focus, deposition, summary judgment
… sought from the Holcomb Agency via deposition and written discovery, a good portion of the topics identified relate to State Farm’s claim handling, including “Hail Focus Initiative,” “Claim Handling Hygiene,” so-called “Wind/Hail Playbook,” training by Haag on identification of hail damage, “HAAG Refresher,” APP 106, § 10, 125 P.3d 1249, 1252 (quoting Kepler v. Strain, 1978 OK 52, $7, 579 P.2d 191, 192).
Search every page of this and 59 other filings: full-text search · Context: Trial Watch calendar
← Reply in Support of ITS Motion for Summary Judgment Timila (West v. StReply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Corrected to Include →
The next document wave is expected around September 19; trial begins December 7. One email per development — filings and unsealed documents only, no marketing, unsubscribe in one click.
Your address is used only for these alerts and is never shared or added to any sales list.
Excerpts are verbatim OCR text from the public court record and may contain OCR errors; refer to the PDF for the authoritative text, or obtain certified copies from the court clerk for court use. Allegations in filings are claims made by parties in litigation, not findings of fact.
About the host: Allied Emergency Services is a licensed storm-damage restoration contractor serving Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan — not a law firm, insurance adjuster or public adjuster, and this page is not legal or insurance advice. We inspect, document, provide insurance-ready repair estimates and complete repairs; coverage decisions always belong to you and your insurer. 24/7: (800) 792-0212