STATE FARM HAIL-CLAIM LITIGATION
Oklahoma · Filed 2026-10-27 · 6 pages · Download the PDF
FILE® IN DMTRICT COURT OKLAHOMA i i ana IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA BILLY and LACY HURSH, ) COUNTY (CT 27 2026 RICK W ARREN 135 court o Plaintiffs, ) v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, MARK D. WELTY, and MARK D. WELTY INSURANCE } ) ) AGENCY, INC., ) Defendants. Case No. CJ-2025-2626 Judge Amy Palumbo 5 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY State Farm Fire and Casualty Company submits this Notice of Supplemental Authority in support of its October 19, 2026 Amended Motion for Summary Judgment set for hearing on November 13, 2026. On October 22, 2026, Judge Claire Eagan District of Oklahoma granted State Farm of the U.S. …
bad faith ×10 · roof replacement ×6 · denial ×5 · summary judgment ×3
PAGE 3 · denial, bad faith, summary judgment, roof replacement
aR Plaintiff argues that State Farm knowingly relied on a deficient investigation to support its partial denial of plaintiff's wind and hail damage claim, and plaintiff provided evidence to State Fann showing that the damage exceeded the small number of damaged shingles identified by State Farm's inspector. Dkt. # 79, at 24. Plaintiff claims that State Farm later relied on the excuse of improper installation to expla …
PAGE 2 · denial, bad faith, roof replacement
… ct that a repair of her roof is not a viable option but, even assuming this to be true, this does not tend to show that State Farm lacked a good faith basis to deny her demand for a total roof replacement. Plaintiff's expert did test whether one particular method of repair would be available, but this merely shows that there is a dispute between the parties as to whether a more limited repair of plaintiff's roof woul …
PAGE 1 · denial, bad faith, summary judgment
… Ex. I (attached). Judge Eagan held that the claim failed as a matter of law because “State Farm relied on a legitimate coverage dispute as a basis to partially deny plaintiff’s claims for wind and hail damage.” Judge Eagan did not consider institutional evidence outside the claim file because of the plaintiff’s discovery failures. Plaintiffs’ proposed institutional evidence is likewise irrelevant here because Plainti …
Search every page of this and 59 other filings: full-text search · Context: Trial Watch calendar
← 20261027-1067280838-plaintiffs-response-to-defendant-state-farm-fire-a20261027-1067262755-plaintiffs-motion-to-enforce-this-court-s-septembe →
The next document wave is expected around September 19; trial begins December 7. One email per development — filings and unsealed documents only, no marketing, unsubscribe in one click.
Your address is used only for these alerts and is never shared or added to any sales list.
Excerpts are verbatim OCR text from the public court record and may contain OCR errors; refer to the PDF for the authoritative text, or obtain certified copies from the court clerk for court use. Allegations in filings are claims made by parties in litigation, not findings of fact.
About the host: Allied Emergency Services is a licensed storm-damage restoration contractor serving Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan — not a law firm, insurance adjuster or public adjuster, and this page is not legal or insurance advice. We inspect, document, provide insurance-ready repair estimates and complete repairs; coverage decisions always belong to you and your insurer. 24/7: (800) 792-0212